{"id":3216,"date":"2026-10-09T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-09T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/?p=3216"},"modified":"2026-10-09T13:00:00","modified_gmt":"2026-10-09T05:00:00","slug":"battery-air-transport-documentation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/supplier-verification\/battery-air-transport-documentation\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Get Supplier Evidence to Ship Batteries by Air or Pause the Booking"},"content":{"rendered":"

How to Get Supplier Evidence to Ship Batteries by Air or Pause the Booking<\/h1>\n

A battery-powered product can look like ordinary consumer goods until the forwarder asks for the battery type, test summary, package details, and dangerous-goods information. A supplier invoice that says \u201celectronics\u201d does not answer those preguntas<\/a>. Battery air transport documentation<\/strong> begins with a clear shipment profile and current qualified review, not a last-minute form request.<\/p>\n

Battery air transport documentation is the evidence file used to describe the actual battery, product configuration, packaging, and shipping route to the people responsible for classification, packing, acceptance, and carriage. It is not a promise that a shipment can fly. It does not replace current dangerous-goods rules, shipper training, operator acceptance, or a carrier’s decision.<\/p>\n

For battery air transport documentation, if the facts are unclear, pause the booking.<\/p>\n

Table of contents<\/h2>\n
    \n
  1. Why is battery air transport documentation more than a supplier certificate?<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. What shipment facts should be collected before a battery booking?<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Why should you verify the UN 38.3 test summary?<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Which photos and packing records should a supplier provide?<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. How should carrier and forwarder acceptance be confirmed?<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. What belongs in a battery air transport documentation file?<\/a><\/li>\n
  7. Which battery conditions should stop routine processing?<\/a><\/li>\n
  8. How should you decide whether to use a different transport mode?<\/a><\/li>\n
  9. What are the limits of a supplier evidence checklist?<\/a><\/li>\n
  10. Frequently asked questions<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Why is battery air transport documentation more than a supplier certificate?<\/h2>\n

    Lithium and sodium-ion battery transport is configuration-specific. A standalone battery, a battery packed with equipment, and a battery contained in equipment can follow different transport provisions. Rechargeable and non-rechargeable batteries use different technical descriptors. Condition, package arrangement, route, operator rules, and current dangerous-goods editions can change what information the shipper and carrier need.<\/p>\n

    IATA states that lithium batteries may be carried by air depending on their configuration and watt-hour rating for rechargeable batteries or lithium content for non-rechargeable batteries. Its battery guidance is intended to explain current definitions, classifications, exceptions, prohibitions, packing, and shipper requirements. [1] That is why battery air transport documentation cannot be copied from an old order or a general product listing.<\/p>\n

    PHMSA says lithium batteries are regulated as hazardous material under the U.S. Hazardous Materials Regulations and must conform to applicable requirements when offered for transport by air, highway, rail, or water. [2] The mode does not eliminate the need for a correct description. Air transport adds its own operational and carrier acceptance decisions.<\/p>\n

    Para battery air transport documentation<\/strong>, treat every claim as a question that needs a source. \u201cOur batteries are air safe\u201d is not enough. Ask what battery design, which configuration, which package, which shipment date, which carrier, and which current rule or carrier instruction supports the statement.<\/p>\n

    In battery air transport documentation, a booking is not a classification.<\/p>\n

    What shipment facts should be collected before a battery booking?<\/h2>\n

    Start with a shipment profile completed by the supplier and reviewed by a qualified dangerous-goods professional or the provider responsible for the transport decision. Do not ask the supplier to pick a classification based on a short online quiz. Ask the supplier to provide facts acerca de<\/a> the product and battery design.<\/p>\n

    Battery air transport documentation should identify the battery chemistry, whether it is rechargeable or non-rechargeable, cell or battery design, brand\/manufacturer, part number, product model\/SKU, configuration, units per product, units per package, package and overpack arrangement, origin, destination, transit points, intended carrier, and current physical condition. Include whether the shipment includes spare batteries, equipment, tracking devices, repair returns, samples, used units, or recalled goods.<\/p>\n

    This table is a fact-gathering sheet, not a dangerous-goods classification chart. The correct classification and packing outcome must be determined under current applicable rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Shipment fact<\/th>\nWhat the supplier should provide<\/th>\nWhy the reviewer needs it<\/th>\nWhat not to infer<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Battery chemistry and type<\/td>\nManufacturer specification and part number<\/td>\nDifferent chemistries and battery types can follow different transport provisions<\/td>\nThat every rechargeable battery is lithium-ion or every lithium battery has the same route<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Rechargeable or non-rechargeable status<\/td>\nProduct and battery data sheet<\/td>\nIATA uses different technical measures for rechargeable and non-rechargeable batteries [1]<\/td>\nThat a product name reveals the correct technical category<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Battery configuration<\/td>\nWhether cells\/batteries are standalone, packed with equipment, or contained in equipment<\/td>\nConfiguration can affect packing, marking, labeling, documentation, and acceptance<\/td>\nThat the device box answers how the battery is configured inside it<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Battery design evidence<\/td>\nCurrent UN 38.3 test summary and identity details<\/td>\nConnects design-test evidence to the battery actually offered<\/td>\nThat one summary covers an unrelated cell, pack, or revised design<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Product and package count<\/td>\nSKU, units, batteries per unit, packages, overpacks, gross details<\/td>\nA qualified reviewer needs the actual shipment arrangement<\/td>\nThat a commercial invoice gives enough package detail<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Condition and history<\/td>\nWritten status for new, used, repaired, prototype, damaged, defective, recalled, disposal\/recycling, or suspect units<\/td>\nAbnormal conditions may require special handling or make routine processing inappropriate<\/td>\nThat an item is normal because it powers on<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Route and carrier<\/td>\nOrigin, destination, transit, operator, forwarder, service level<\/td>\nOperator and route acceptance can differ<\/td>\nThat a previous carrier acceptance controls a new booking<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    Battery air transport documentation should also record who supplied each fact and when. A abastecimiento<\/a> team may collect product data, while the battery maker holds test records and the forwarder holds current booking rules. Naming the owner prevents a last-minute gap.<\/p>\n

    For battery air transport documentation, facts come before labels.<\/p>\n

    Why should you verify the UN 38.3 test summary?<\/h2>\n

    For battery air transport documentation, UN 38.3 is a design-test requirement, not a blanket boarding pass for an air shipment. PHMSA says lithium cells and batteries offered for transport must have passed the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Section 38.3 design tests. It also says manufacturers must make test-summary documents available upon request for battery designs offered for transport. [2]<\/p>\n

    PHMSA’s test-summary resource explains that the test summary is meant to support understanding and implementation of the UN 38.3 test-summary requirement. [3] In a supplier file, the summary is an important traceability document. It helps a buyer and qualified reviewer identify the design, manufacturer, test laboratory, and other stated elements. It does not decide the shipment classification, package requirements, declaration status, or carrier acceptance on its own.<\/p>\n

    For battery air transport documentation, compare the test summary with the product bill of materials and battery identity. Check the battery manufacturer or responsible party, model\/design reference, test report reference, cell or battery description, product configuration, and any relevant dates or revisions. Ask the supplier to explain differences in name, capacity, pack assembly, cell source, or product model before relying on the document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    UN 38.3 summary check<\/th>\nEvidence to compare<\/th>\nWhy the match matters<\/th>\nEscalate when<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Battery or cell design identity<\/td>\nSummary, battery label, data sheet, product BOM<\/td>\nThe summary should relate to the actual design offered<\/td>\nThe part number, maker, chemistry, or construction differs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Responsible party<\/td>\nSummary issuer, supplier authorization, manufacturer contacto<\/a><\/td>\nConfirms who can explain the evidence<\/td>\nThe supplier cannot identify the battery manufacturer or summary owner<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Report linkage<\/td>\nTest summary and referenced testing information<\/td>\nCreates a record path for the design-test claim<\/td>\nA report number is absent, altered, or cannot be verified<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Product configuration<\/td>\nProduct photos, pack assembly details, equipment\/SKU<\/td>\nA battery inside a device may not be the same as a standalone sample record<\/td>\nThe current pack or device differs from the documented configuration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Document freshness and change record<\/td>\nSummary version, production change history, supplier notice<\/td>\nA changed design may need renewed qualified review<\/td>\nCells, BMS, enclosure, capacity, supplier, or assembly changed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    Do not edit a test summary, create a new one from a sales brochure, or accept an untraceable scan because the container date is close. Battery air transport documentation must show the actual product facts, even when they make the booking slower.<\/p>\n

    Which photos and packing records should a supplier provide?<\/h2>\n

    In battery air transport documentation, photographs support communication. They let a qualified reviewer compare the real product and packing arrangement with the description provided to the carrier or dangerous-goods provider. They are not a replacement for a physical inspection, classification, or approved packing decision.<\/p>\n

    Request clear, dated images of the battery or cell marking where visible, the powered product, the battery compartment or product configuration when relevant, terminal protection where applicable, inner packaging, outer package, labels and marks, closure, cushioning or separation arrangement, and any overpack. Also request images after the package is closed, not only of loose components on a workbench.<\/p>\n

    Battery air transport documentation should link each image set to the supplier order, SKU, factory, package reference, and date. If the production package differs from the test sample, prototype, or quotation photo, record the difference and seek qualified review. A photo of one correctly packed package does not prove every carton uses the same process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Visual or packing record<\/th>\nWhat it should show<\/th>\nWhy it supports the file<\/th>\nCommon gap<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Battery\/product photo<\/td>\nProduct model, battery information where visible, physical condition<\/td>\nConnects documentation to the actual goods<\/td>\nPhoto shows a marketing sample, not the shipment configuration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Inner-pack photo<\/td>\nSeparation, restraint, protective materials, component arrangement<\/td>\nShows how items are presented before outer packaging<\/td>\nOnly loose batteries are photographed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Outer-package photo<\/td>\nPackage construction, closure, marks and labels that a reviewer expects to inspect<\/td>\nLets the carrier\/qualified reviewer compare prepared cargo with submitted information<\/td>\nPhoto is taken before final labels or after labels were removed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Overpack or pallet photo<\/td>\nRelationship of packages, outer handling state, visible marks<\/td>\nHelps identify additional handling and communication needs<\/td>\nMixed cartons or other goods are not disclosed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Packing list and carton map<\/td>\nSKU, quantity, cartons, packs, and product\/battery relationship<\/td>\nLinks commercial and physical records<\/td>\nQuantities or models differ from the product sheet<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Production release note<\/td>\nFactory, lot, date, responsible person, completed checks<\/td>\nSupports traceability if an issue arises<\/td>\nNo evidence of which production run actually shipped<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    The FAA says shippers must properly pack, prepare, and communicate batteries to air carriers. [4] Supplier images make that communication more concrete, but the shipper must still use current qualified instructions to determine whether the packaging is suitable for the specific shipment.<\/p>\n

    For battery air transport documentation, a photo is supporting evidence, not clearance.<\/p>\n

    How should carrier and forwarder acceptance be confirmed?<\/h2>\n

    In battery air transport documentation, carrier acceptance is not permanent. IATA\u2019s guidance is updated as dangerous-goods rules evolve, and its current materials address definitions, classifications, exceptions, prohibitions, packing, marking, labeling, and documentation. [1] Airlines and integrators can apply operator variations or service-specific conditions. A confirmation for one route, date, configuration, or carrier may not apply to another.<\/p>\n

    For battery air transport documentation, send the qualified party or forwarder an accurate shipment profile before booking. Ask what information they need to assess the shipment, which current rule set and operator requirements apply, whether they will accept the configuration, and what documents or images they need before tender. Keep their answer with the file.<\/p>\n

    Do not use a carrier\u2019s tentative rate cita<\/a> as proof of acceptance. Do not change descriptions after approval to make a package \u201cfit\u201d an easier category. If the supplier changes cell maker, battery design, product configuration, package count, label, condition, airport, destination, or carrier, reopen the discussion.<\/p>\n

    IATA points to training that covers identification, packing, marking, labeling, and documentation for battery transport. [1] If your business is offering a regulated shipment, make sure the party performing shipper functions has the required current competence and training. This article cannot qualify a person to make that decision.<\/p>\n

    What belongs in a battery air transport documentation file?<\/h2>\n

    For battery air transport documentation, a good file gives a qualified reviewer one coherent view of the goods. It should not be a folder of unnamed PDFs. Make an index with document owner, version, date, product\/SKU, battery identity, shipment reference, and the question each item answers.<\/p>\n

    Battery air transport documentation may include the supplier\u2019s battery identity statement, current UN 38.3 test summary, product\/BOM configuration sheet, condition statement, product and packing photos, qualified classification decision or guidance, carrier or forwarder acceptance instructions, package preparation evidence, booking correspondence, commercial records, and any required declaration or transport record applicable to the actual shipment. The exact record set depends on the classification, configuration, current rules, and operator instructions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    File section<\/th>\nExample content<\/th>\nFile control<\/a><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Product and battery identity<\/td>\nProduct SKU, battery part number, chemistry, rechargeable status, manufacturer, configuration<\/td>\nMatch against purchase order, BOM, and factory release<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Design-test evidence<\/td>\nUN 38.3 test summary and linked supplier explanation<\/td>\nVerify design identity and retain original source file<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Condition assessment<\/td>\nNew\/used\/repair\/return\/prototype\/damaged\/defective\/recalled\/disposal statement<\/td>\nRequire a named factory representative and date; escalate abnormal status<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Package evidence<\/td>\nInner\/outer\/overpack photos, package map, closure and marking\/label record<\/td>\nRelate images to shipment date and package reference<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Transport decision<\/td>\nQualified classification\/packing review and carrier acceptance information<\/td>\nRecord rule edition, route, carrier, assumptions, and decision owner<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Shipment execution<\/td>\nBooking, commercial documents, required transport documents, handoff communication<\/td>\nReconcile with final package and actual dispatch<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Change and incident log<\/td>\nProduct, battery, route, carrier, package, or condition changes<\/td>\nRequire re-review before the shipment is offered<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    This battery air transport documentation file should be reviewed before handoff, not reconstructed after a carrier refuses the cargo. Keep it available to the people who need to answer questions quickly, but control access to proprietary test and product information.<\/p>\n

    Which battery conditions should stop routine processing?<\/h2>\n

    In battery air transport documentation, some conditions are not suitable for a routine air-freight workflow. A battery or device may be damaged, defective, recalled, used, repaired, a prototype, intended for disposal or recycling, physically altered, leaking, swollen, overheated, poorly identified, or connected to an incident. Stop treating it as standard cargo until a qualified dangerous-goods professional and the relevant carrier or authority advises on the applicable path.<\/p>\n

    The FAA warns against shipping or loading a damaged package containing lithium batteries and states that damaged, defective, or recalled batteries have restrictions. [4] PHMSA also describes heightened hazards for damaged, defective, or recalled batteries and directs shippers to detailed safety recursos<\/a>. [2] These sources are not a license to choose another transport mode without review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Condition or signal<\/th>\nWhy routine processing should pause<\/th>\nSafe operational response<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Damaged package or battery<\/td>\nPhysical damage can increase short-circuit or fire risk<\/td>\nIsolate from routine export workflow and seek qualified instructions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Recalled or defective unit<\/td>\nRecall\/defect status can change transport conditions<\/td>\nConfirm exact status, preserve records, and consult current carrier\/regulator guidance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Used, returned, repaired, or prototype item<\/td>\nProduct history may affect the applicable transport analysis<\/td>\nProvide full condition and design history before any shipment decision<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Missing UN 38.3 summary or mismatched identity<\/td>\nDesign-test evidence cannot be connected to the offered battery<\/td>\nDo not substitute a generic document; obtain verifiable evidence or escalate<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Supplier asks to relabel as general electronics<\/td>\nMisdescription may conceal a dangerous good<\/td>\nRefuse the change and correct the shipment profile<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Package differs from approved images or instructions<\/td>\nThe prepared package may not match the assessed configuration<\/td>\nStop handoff and obtain qualified re-review<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    For battery air transport documentation, record why the file was paused, who was notified, which goods were affected, and what information is still missing. The right response is not to solve the issue with new wording on the invoice.<\/p>\n

    For battery air transport documentation, pause is a safety control.<\/p>\n

    How should you decide whether to use a different transport mode?<\/h2>\n

    In battery air transport documentation, do not frame this as \u201cair versus sea-only.\u201d Each mode has its own laws, carrier rules, packaging conditions, routes, and document expectations. PHMSA states that lithium batteries must conform to applicable U.S. requirements when offered by air, highway, rail, or water. [2] A problem with an air booking does not make a shipment automatically acceptable by vessel, road, or rail.<\/p>\n

    If a qualified party determines that the actual goods cannot be offered for the intended air route under current requirements or carrier conditions, preserve the facts and ask for a lawful, case-specific assessment of alternatives. That assessment should consider battery condition, classification, route, destination, carrier or operator rules, packing, documentation, and any restrictions on damaged, recalled, prototype, waste, or used units.<\/p>\n

    Battery air transport documentation is still valuable when air is not selected. The shipment profile, test-summary record, photos, condition disclosure, and product identity file help the next qualified provider understand the goods. Never change the declared identity, conceal battery content, split packages to evade controls, change labels without basis, or describe batteries as ordinary electronics to force a booking.<\/p>\n

    For battery air transport documentation, the mode follows the facts.<\/p>\n

    What are the limits of a supplier evidence checklist?<\/h2>\n

    Battery air transport documentation supports a decision, but it cannot classify a dangerous good, certify a package, approve a carrier booking, or transfer the shipper’s responsibilities to the factory. A UN 38.3 test summary does not determine air eligibility by itself. Photos do not prove compliance. A forwarder\u2019s prior email may not apply to a new route or updated rule edition.<\/p>\n

    Battery air transport documentation also cannot replace trained personnel, current IATA DGR and ICAO Technical Instructions, carrier\/operator requirements, domestic hazardous-materials rules, or the specific review needed for abnormal batteries and devices. IATA\u2019s current materials and the FAA\u2019s resources are useful starting points, but the shipment decision must be based on the exact current rules and facts. [1] [4]<\/p>\n

    If you cannot identify the battery design, condition, configuration, or carrier acceptance route, do not offer the goods for carriage as though the answer were known. Obtain qualified dangerous-goods asistencia<\/a> first.<\/p>\n

    Battery air transport documentation requires accurate facts that protect every handler.<\/p>\n

    Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n

    What is battery air transport documentation?<\/h3>\n

    Battery air transport documentation is the product, battery, packing, test-summary, condition, and transport evidence used to support a qualified air-shipment decision. It does not guarantee that a carrier will accept the cargo.<\/p>\n

    Does every battery shipment need the same paperwork?<\/h3>\n

    No. The applicable records depend on battery chemistry, rechargeable status, configuration, condition, package arrangement, route, current rules, and carrier instructions. IATA notes that air-carriage conditions depend on configuration and battery technical characteristics. [1]<\/p>\n

    What is a UN 38.3 test summary?<\/h3>\n

    It is a document containing standardized information related to the UN 38.3 design-test requirement for lithium cell and battery designs offered for transport. PHMSA says manufacturers must make the test summary available upon request. [2]<\/p>\n

    Does a UN 38.3 test summary mean the battery can fly?<\/h3>\n

    No. It is design-test evidence. It does not decide the shipment\u2019s classification, packing, markings, documentation, route, carrier acceptance, or treatment of damaged or abnormal goods.<\/p>\n

    What should I compare to a supplier\u2019s test summary?<\/h3>\n

    Compare the battery maker, model\/design reference, chemistry, product configuration, bill of materials, product images, and any stated report linkage. Escalate mismatches before using the summary for a shipment decision.<\/p>\n

    Why should a supplier provide packing photos?<\/h3>\n

    Photos help a qualified reviewer compare the actual battery and package arrangement with the shipment profile and carrier requirements. They do not replace formal classification or carrier acceptance.<\/p>\n

    Can I describe a battery-powered product as \u201celectronics\u201d on the booking?<\/h3>\n

    Do not use a description that conceals or misstates dangerous-goods content. Provide accurate battery and product facts to the qualified shipper, forwarder, and carrier so they can determine the correct treatment.<\/p>\n

    What should I do if a battery is damaged, defective, or recalled?<\/h3>\n

    Stop routine processing and obtain current, qualified dangerous-goods and carrier guidance. FAA and PHMSA resources describe restrictions and elevated risks for such batteries. [2] [4]<\/p>\n

    Can I move the goods by sea if air carriage is not possible?<\/h3>\n

    Do not assume so. A different mode has separate transport, carrier, and destination requirements. Seek a qualified assessment based on the actual battery condition, classification, route, and shipment arrangement.<\/p>\n

    Does a forwarder\u2019s old approval apply to a new shipment?<\/h3>\n

    Not necessarily. Carrier policies, route conditions, product configuration, package arrangement, and current rule editions can change. Request current written acceptance instructions for the actual booking.<\/p>\n

    Who is responsible for battery transport information?<\/h3>\n

    Responsibilities depend on the role and jurisdiction, but supplier product facts, shipper preparation, forwarder handling, and carrier acceptance should be clearly assigned. A buyer should keep a record of who provided and reviewed each fact.<\/p>\n

    Referencias<\/h2>\n

    [1] International Air Transport Association, Batteries and Lithium Battery Guidance<\/a><\/p>\n

    [2] U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Transporting Lithium Batteries<\/a><\/p>\n

    [3] U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Lithium Battery Test Summaries<\/a><\/p>\n

    [4] Federal Aviation Administration, Lithium Battery Resources<\/a><\/p>\n

    Related reading<\/h2>\n

    Continue with accredited testing lab selection<\/a>, customs detention release planning<\/a>, GHS SDS authenticity checks<\/a>, and supplier document verification<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Build battery air transport documentation with UN 38.3 evidence, packing records, carrier review, and escalation controls.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_internal_links_processed":["1"],"_uag_page_assets":["a:9:{s:3:\"css\";s:263:\".uag-blocks-common-selector{z-index:var(--z-index-desktop) !important}@media (max-width: 976px){.uag-blocks-common-selector{z-index:var(--z-index-tablet) !important}}@media (max-width: 767px){.uag-blocks-common-selector{z-index:var(--z-index-mobile) !important}}\n\";s:2:\"js\";s:0:\"\";s:18:\"current_block_list\";a:15:{i:0;s:11:\"core\/search\";i:1;s:10:\"core\/group\";i:2;s:12:\"core\/heading\";i:3;s:17:\"core\/latest-posts\";i:4;s:20:\"core\/latest-comments\";i:5;s:13:\"core\/archives\";i:6;s:15:\"core\/categories\";i:8;s:25:\"greenshift-blocks\/heading\";i:9;s:22:\"greenshift-blocks\/text\";i:10;s:14:\"core\/paragraph\";i:12;s:18:\"core\/legacy-widget\";i:13;s:17:\"core\/social-links\";i:15;s:16:\"core\/social-link\";i:16;s:21:\"trp\/language-switcher\";i:17;s:9:\"core\/html\";}s:8:\"uag_flag\";b:0;s:11:\"uag_version\";s:10:\"1791622807\";s:6:\"gfonts\";a:0:{}s:10:\"gfonts_url\";s:0:\"\";s:12:\"gfonts_files\";a:0:{}s:14:\"uag_faq_layout\";b:0;}"],"_uag_css_file_name":["uag-css-3216.css"]},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supplier-verification"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"trp-custom-language-flag":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"admin","author_link":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/author\/admin\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Build battery air transport documentation with UN 38.3 evidence, packing records, carrier review, and escalation controls.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3216"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3216\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3443,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3216\/revisions\/3443"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3216"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}