{"id":2447,"date":"2026-08-18T15:59:37","date_gmt":"2026-08-18T07:59:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/sourcing-basics\/what-is-bill-of-lading-why-it-matters\/"},"modified":"2026-08-21T15:52:43","modified_gmt":"2026-08-21T07:52:43","slug":"what-is-bill-of-lading-why-it-matters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/sourcing-basics\/what-is-bill-of-lading-why-it-matters\/","title":{"rendered":"What Is a Bill of Lading and Why Does It Matter?"},"content":{"rendered":"

A bill of lading can look like another shipping PDF. It is not.<\/p>\n

It connects the physical shipment to the carrier\u2019s transport record and to the named parties in the shipping workflow. A wrong consignee, wrong destination point, wrong package count, or unclear release path can create a problem long after the factory has packed the goods.<\/p>\n

The practical goal is not to turn every buyer into a shipping lawyer. It is to make sure the correct people review the correct data antes<\/strong> the carrier document is issued or the cargo is released.<\/p>\n

\n

Legal and logistics-information note:<\/strong> This article is general education about shipping-document control. It is not legal, customs, tax, insurance, banking, payment, or transaction-specific logistics advice. The legal effect of a bill of lading, release rights, ownership\/title, payment conditions, carrier liability, and document requirements depend on the document type, contract, jurisdiction, carrier terms, Incoterm, transaction, and applicable law. Confirm the actual workflow with the carrier\/forwarder and qualified legal, trade, customs, banking, and logistics professionals.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The U.S. Census Bureau defines a bill of lading as a document establishing the terms of a contract between a shipper and a transportation company for freight moved between specified points and for a specified charge. Its glossary describes it as a document of title, contract of carriage, and receipt for goods. 1<\/a> Those functions explain why a casual \u201clooks fine\u201d review is not enough.<\/p>\n

Start with the three jobs a bill of lading can perform<\/h2>\n

A bill of lading is often discussed as if it has one meaning. In practice, its function and effect depend on the type of document and the transaction. Still, three basic jobs help a buyer understand why the document belongs in the control process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Function<\/th>\nPlain-language meaning<\/th>\nWhy a buyer cares<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Evidence of carriage contract<\/td>\nIt records the carrier\u2019s transport arrangement with the shipment parties<\/td>\nThe named parties, movement points, and carrier terms must match the agreed shipping plan<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Receipt of goods<\/td>\nIt acknowledges the carrier has received freight for transport, subject to the wording and document type<\/td>\nShipment data must match the cargo actually handed over, not an outdated order estimate<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Document-of-title function<\/td>\nSome B\/L forms can carry title-related\/document-control significance<\/td>\nThe release path must be deliberately agreed; do not assume any PDF or document copy has the same effect<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The International Trade Administration distinguishes a straight, non-negotiable vessel B\/L from a negotiable or shipper\u2019s-order B\/L and says an original B\/L is commonly needed as proof of ownership to take possession. 2<\/a> That is a reason to seek transaction-specific advice, not a reason to make a title or release decision from a generic article.<\/p>\n

Know the main parties before you check the fields<\/h2>\n

A document review starts by confirming who each party is supposed to be. Names that look similar can represent different legal entities, addresses, functions, or notification contacts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Party\/role<\/th>\nGeneral role in the shipment<\/th>\nReview question<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Shipper<\/td>\nThe party supplying goods for transport; often the supplier or an origin warehouse\/manufacturer<\/td>\nIs the legal name, address, and stated shipping role correct for the actual handoff?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Carrier<\/td>\nThe party moving the cargo, such as shipping line, airline, trucker, rail carrier, or contracted carrier<\/td>\nDoes the document identify the right carrier and document issuer for the booked service?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Consignee<\/td>\nThe party designated to receive or claim the shipment at destination<\/td>\nIs the named entity exactly the one approved for this transaction and document\/release workflow?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Notify party<\/td>\nThe party to be notified about shipment events where used<\/td>\nAre the contacts current, able to respond, and aligned with broker\/receiver instructions?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Forwarder\/NVOCC\/agent<\/td>\nA provider that may arrange transport or issue a house document depending on the setup<\/td>\nIs the role and issuing-document relationship clear to everyone who must use the record?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Importer of record \/ broker contact<\/td>\nA party responsible for destination import process in some transactions<\/td>\nIs this separate role captured in the current handoff instructions where needed?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Receiver\/warehouse<\/td>\nThe physical delivery and receiving location<\/td>\nDoes the final delivery\/contact information align with the transport plan and delivery appointment process?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Maersk describes the shipper as the party supplying the goods, the carrier as the party that moves them, and the consignee as the party designated to receive them. 3<\/a> Those definitions are useful, but the parties should still confirm their exact roles in the actual contract and shipment instructions.<\/p>\n

What a buyer should see on the draft document<\/h2>\n

Do not wait for a final document to start checking. Build a draft-review checklist into the booking and shipping-instructions workflow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Data area<\/th>\nCheck against<\/th>\nQuestions to answer<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Document identity<\/td>\nBooking reference, carrier\/forwarder instruction, order file<\/td>\nWho issued this document? Is it house, master, carrier, forwarder, original, sea waybill, or another stated form?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Shipper\/consignee\/notify party<\/td>\nPurchase order, approved entity list, destination instructions<\/td>\nAre names, addresses, contacts, and roles exact? Has anyone changed entity or contact without a documented approval?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cargo description<\/td>\nReleased product specification, commercial invoice, packing list<\/td>\nDoes the description identify the correct goods without copying an obsolete SKU, color, model, or packaging version?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Quantity\/packing<\/td>\nFinal packing record and packing list<\/td>\nDo package count, package type, marks, gross weight, volume, and other final packing facts match?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Movement points<\/td>\nBooking, Incoterm\/named place, freight plan<\/td>\nAre port\/place of receipt, loading, discharge, delivery, and final destination fields consistent with the agreed scope?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Freight\/payment notation<\/td>\nAgreed commercial and freight instructions<\/td>\nIs the stated freight-payment handling aligned with the agreed process? Route payment\/legal questions to the appropriate professional.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Dates\/events<\/td>\nBooking and carrier\/forwarder update<\/td>\nAre the issue, on-board\/departure, or other document events accurately recorded as relevant to the document type?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Special instructions\/references<\/td>\nPO, booking, label, broker\/warehouse instructions<\/td>\nAre references, marks, seals, handling notes, release contacts, and required instructions current and complete?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Document type\/release method<\/td>\nWritten transaction workflow<\/td>\nIs the team clear on whether it expects originals, a sea waybill, an electronic\/telex release, or another process?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Maersk lists party details, cargo description, cargo weight, package count, volume, payment terms, port of loading, port of discharge, and bill type among the information that can appear on a B\/L. 3<\/a> Treat that as a starting set, not a universal mandatory-field list for every country, carrier, mode, or document form.<\/p>\n

Match the B\/L to the documents that create the facts<\/h2>\n

A B\/L should not become the first place where a buyer discovers the cargo details. It should reflect controlled facts already established in the order, packing, and transport process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Source record<\/th>\nWhat it should help verify<\/th>\nOwner of source record<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Purchase order \/ order confirmation<\/td>\nBuyer\/seller entity, product scope, quantity, named delivery point, agreed instructions<\/td>\nBuyer + supplier<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Released specification \/ packing artwork<\/td>\nCorrect product description, marks, labels, configuration, packaging version<\/td>\nBuyer + supplier<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Final production\/inspection release<\/td>\nApproved quantity, release status, exceptions, actual shipment authorization<\/td>\nBuyer + supplier\/inspector<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Final packing list<\/td>\nCarton\/pallet count, marks, weights, dimensions, package contents<\/td>\nSupplier + buyer review<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Commercial invoice<\/td>\nParty information, product description, quantity, value\/currency\/terms as applicable<\/td>\nSupplier + buyer review<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Booking confirmation<\/td>\nCarrier\/service, booking reference, equipment, origin\/destination transport points, cargo-ready\/cutoff facts<\/td>\nForwarder\/carrier + supplier\/buyer<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cargo handoff\/warehouse receipt<\/td>\nActual handover quantity\/condition and visible discrepancy record<\/td>\nForwarder\/warehouse + supplier<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Destination\/broker instructions<\/td>\nConsignee\/notify\/broker contacts and current handoff requirements<\/td>\nBuyer + relevant representative<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

For an earlier document-level consistency check, see Commercial Invoice and Packing List: What Importers Need to Check<\/a>. For the timing controls around cargo-ready, booking, departure, documents, and receiving, see How to Plan Production Time, Shipping Time, and Customs Time<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Original B\/L, sea waybill, and electronic release are different workflows<\/h2>\n

Words such as \u201cB\/L,\u201d \u201coriginal,\u201d \u201ctelex release,\u201d and \u201csea waybill\u201d are often used loosely in operations calls. They should not be used interchangeably.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Term<\/th>\nGeneral description from the sources<\/th>\nOperational control point<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Straight\/non-negotiable B\/L<\/td>\nITA describes a straight vessel B\/L as non-negotiable and not giving title<\/td>\nDo not infer who can claim cargo from a label alone; confirm the actual carrier and transaction process<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Negotiable \/ shipper\u2019s-order B\/L<\/td>\nITA describes it as negotiable and capable of being bought, sold, or traded while goods are in transit<\/td>\nEscalate title, payment, release, and endorsement questions to qualified professionals before document issue\/release<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Original B\/L<\/td>\nMaersk describes it as a primary sea-transport document used as contract evidence, receipt, and legal title; its process says the buyer\/consignee presents the original to receive cargo<\/td>\nIdentify the number\/control of originals, custody path, release authority, and timing before shipment\u2014not at arrival<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sea waybill<\/td>\nMaersk describes it as evidence of contract and receipt, but not title; the named party can collect without presenting a document of ownership in its stated process<\/td>\nConfirm that the named consignee and release instruction are correct before issue because the workflow differs from original-document control<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Telex\/electronic cargo release<\/td>\nMaersk describes it as a method of releasing an original-B\/L shipment electronically, not a B\/L type<\/td>\nRecord who may authorize release, how authorization is confirmed, who receives notice, and how the carrier\/agent confirms execution<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
House\/master document<\/td>\nA forwarder and carrier may issue different records in a multi-party transport setup<\/td>\nAsk which document is relevant to each party\u2019s booking, release, broker, and delivery step; do not assume one document replaces the other<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The document form is a commercial and legal decision, not a formatting preference. Before choosing or accepting a workflow, the buyer should align the supplier, forwarder\/carrier, payment team, consignee, and qualified advisers on the release process.<\/p>\n

Freeze shipping instructions before the carrier makes the document<\/h2>\n

A late correction is more than an admin task. It can affect documents, handoffs, release instructions, broker information, invoices, and delivery planning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Before shipping instructions are sent<\/th>\nConfirm<\/th>\nEvidence to keep<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Entity details<\/td>\nShipper, consignee, notify party, broker\/representative, physical receiver, contacts<\/td>\nApproved party\/contact sheet with date\/version<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cargo facts<\/td>\nProduct description, package count\/type, marks, weight, volume, special handling<\/td>\nFinal packout data, photos where useful, packing-list draft<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Movement facts<\/td>\nBooking reference, places\/ports, service, cargo-ready\/handoff status, delivery instructions<\/td>\nBooking confirmation and current freight plan<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Commercial references<\/td>\nPO, invoice reference, freight\/payment instruction, supplier\/buyer internal reference<\/td>\nApproved instruction record; route sensitive questions to the right owners<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Release expectation<\/td>\nDocument type, original\/waybill\/electronic-release method, approval\/custody\/contact path<\/td>\nWritten release workflow with owner and escalation contact<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Change process<\/td>\nWho can request amendment, who validates it, who pays\/approves any related cost, who must be notified<\/td>\nChange-control log and communications list<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Give the forwarder\/carrier one controlled shipping-instructions file. If the supplier sends a different version directly, the buyer should know before the document is generated.<\/p>\n

Use a two-stage review: data review, then release review<\/h2>\n

Trying to solve everything in one approval email hides the most important question: are we checking facts, or are we authorizing a release path?<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Review stage<\/th>\nWhat the team checks<\/th>\nTypical evidence<\/th>\nDecision output<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1. Draft data review<\/td>\nParties, cargo, packing, route, references, instructions, document type label<\/td>\nPO, booking, invoice draft, packing list, cargo-ready record, approved party list<\/td>\nCorrect<\/code> \/ amend<\/code> \/ hold for clarification<\/code><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2. Release workflow review<\/td>\nOriginal\/waybill\/electronic path, signatories\/authorizers, document custody, destination notice, broker\/receiver coordination<\/td>\nCarrier\/forwarder procedure, written transaction plan, qualified advice where needed<\/td>\nProceed under documented process<\/code> \/ pause and escalate<\/code><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3. Post-issue handoff review<\/td>\nFinal document version, transmission\/receipt, changes, destination contacts, tracking of original\/release confirmation<\/td>\nFinal copy\/original-control record, carrier\/agent confirmation, communication log<\/td>\nReceived and aligned<\/code> \/ exception open<\/code><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4. Destination closeout<\/td>\nRelease\/delivery\/receiving evidence and any discrepancy<\/td>\nRelease notice, proof of delivery, receiving record, discrepancy log<\/td>\nClosed<\/code> \/ claim\/exception path as applicable<\/code><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

A reviewer can usually check whether package count matches the final packing list. That does not make the same person qualified to decide title, carrier liability, payment security, or legal release entitlement. Keep those approvals separate.<\/p>\n

Create a correction workflow that does not rely on memory<\/h2>\n

When an error appears, the fastest response is not always \u201cchange it immediately.\u201d First identify whether the error is in the source record, the carrier draft, a booking instruction, a shipment handoff, or the buyer\u2019s understanding of the process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Correction step<\/th>\nAcci\u00f3n<\/th>\nWhy it matters<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1. Stop uncontrolled forwarding<\/td>\nMark the problematic version as draft\/superseded and tell affected teams not to use it<\/td>\nPrevents broker, warehouse, supplier, or consignee teams from working from different facts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2. Identify the source of truth<\/td>\nCompare the disputed field to the released order, final packing data, booking, and approved party list<\/td>\nDistinguishes a document entry error from a real cargo or instruction change<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3. Classify the difference<\/td>\nTypo, formatting, party\/entity, route\/place, cargo description, quantity\/packing, release instruction, or commercial field<\/td>\nSome differences require wider escalation than others<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4. Assess downstream impact<\/td>\nCheck invoice, packing list, booking, labels, broker data, destination instructions, and release workflow<\/td>\nA correction in one document may create a mismatch elsewhere<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5. Request amendment through the authorized channel<\/td>\nUse the carrier\/forwarder\u2019s documented amendment process and identify who may approve cost\/process consequences<\/td>\nKeeps an audit trail and avoids informal side instructions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6. Verify the revised version<\/td>\nCompare revision to source records and record who reviewed it<\/td>\nConfirms the correction did not introduce a new mismatch<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7. Communicate the result<\/td>\nSend the current version and change note to the right supplier, forwarder, broker, consignee, and receiver contacts<\/td>\nCloses the gap between document correction and operating reality<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Use a simple log: document reference, field changed, old\/new value, reason, source evidence, requestor, approver, provider confirmation, affected parties, and date\/time.<\/p>\n

Keep document control connected to the physical cargo<\/h2>\n

A perfect document cannot repair the wrong cargo. The document workflow should connect to final inspection, packaging, marks, carton count, and handoff evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Physical-cargo checkpoint<\/th>\nDocument-control question<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Final inspection\/release<\/td>\nIs the shipment authorized, and have any approved exceptions been reflected in product\/packing records?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Final packing<\/td>\nDo carton\/pallet count, marks, weights, dimensions, and package type match the document basis?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pickup\/warehouse handoff<\/td>\nIs the handed-over quantity\/condition recorded, and is there a discrepancy process if it differs?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Booking\/carrier handoff<\/td>\nDoes the correct booked service and cargo data appear in the transport workflow?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Departure\/issue event<\/td>\nIs the issued document based on current shipping instructions and actual shipment data?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Destination release\/delivery<\/td>\nDo consignee\/notify\/receiver contacts and final documents support the planned handoff without contradictory versions?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Receiving<\/td>\nDo received package count\/condition records create a traceable exception if something differs?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

For photos and video evidence that can support a quality-control record before cargo release, see How to Use Photos and Video in a Quality Control Report<\/a>. Keep the evidence linked to the same PO, shipment reference, and document version.<\/p>\n

Common mistakes that create avoidable risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Mistake<\/th>\nWhy it causes trouble<\/th>\nBetter control<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Copying party details from an old shipment<\/td>\nA past consignee, notify contact, or importer\/broker detail may no longer be correct<\/td>\nUse a dated approved party\/contact record for the current shipment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Reviewing only the top of the document<\/td>\nCritical data may sit in cargo, port\/place, freight, release, or reference fields<\/td>\nUse the field-by-field draft checklist<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Treating a B\/L copy as proof that all release rights are settled<\/td>\nDocument type and transaction conditions affect the workflow<\/td>\nConfirm the carrier\/forwarder process and seek qualified advice for consequential questions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mixing commercial invoice data and B\/L data without cross-checking<\/td>\nQuantity, description, party, package, and routing conflicts can surface late<\/td>\nRun a controlled invoice\u2013packing list\u2013B\/L\u2013booking comparison<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Changing shipping instructions informally by chat<\/td>\nSupplier, forwarder, carrier, broker, and receiver can act on different versions<\/td>\nUse one owner, version number, written change log, and confirmed distribution<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Waiting until arrival to ask about originals or electronic release<\/td>\nPhysical and document timing may no longer align<\/td>\nAgree release\/custody contacts and escalation before departure<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Assuming the forwarder resolves every role<\/td>\nThe buyer\/importer\/consignee may retain decisions and responsibilities<\/td>\nAssign owner for party data, document review, release instructions, broker handoff, and receiving<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ignoring package\/mark\/weight differences because the product is correct<\/td>\nPacking data affects transport, receiving, documents, and exception handling<\/td>\nReconcile final packing data before document approval<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

A compact bill-of-lading control checklist<\/h2>\n

Before you approve shipping instructions or a draft B\/L, confirm:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. You know who issued the document and what document type\/workflow is being proposed.<\/li>\n
  2. Shipper, consignee, notify party, receiver, broker\/representative contacts, and addresses match the current transaction records.<\/li>\n
  3. Product description, package count\/type, marks, weights, volume, and references match final packing and invoice data.<\/li>\n
  4. Place\/port of receipt, loading, discharge, delivery, and final destination fields match the booked transport plan and agreed named point.<\/li>\n
  5. Freight\/payment wording is reviewed by the appropriate commercial owner; title\/payment\/legal questions are escalated rather than guessed.<\/li>\n
  6. The supplier, buyer, forwarder\/carrier, broker, consignee, and receiver know who owns each document\/release step.<\/li>\n
  7. Original, sea-waybill, electronic release, or other document-control path is written down with named contacts and escalation steps.<\/li>\n
  8. Any change uses a controlled amendment process with source evidence, version tracking, authorization, and notification.<\/li>\n
  9. Final issued documents are reconciled with the booking, commercial invoice, packing list, quality\/packout release, and destination handoff instructions.<\/li>\n
  10. The team retains the quote\/booking\/document\/release\/delivery\/receiving records under one shipment reference.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    A bill of lading matters because it ties the carrier\u2019s transport record to a real cargo movement and named parties. Treat it as an operating control document, not an attachment to file after the shipment leaves.<\/p>\n

    Referencias<\/h2>\n
      \n
    1. U.S. Census Bureau, International Trade Definitions<\/em><\/a><\/li>\n
    2. International Trade Administration, Bill of Lading<\/em><\/a><\/li>\n
    3. Maersk, Bill of Lading: What It Is and Why It Is Important<\/em><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      A bill of lading can look like another shipping PDF. It is not. It connects the physical shipment to the […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_internal_links_processed":["1"],"rank_math_title":["What Is a Bill of Lading and Why Does It Matter?"],"rank_math_description":["Understand what a bill of lading records, who it names, how original B\/L and sea waybill workflows differ, and what buyers should check before release."],"rank_math_focus_keyword":["what is a bill of lading"],"rank_math_rich_snippet":["article"],"_rank_math_rich_snippet":["article"],"rank_math_schema_Article":["a:2:{s:5:\"@type\";s:7:\"Article\";s:8:\"headline\";s:48:\"What Is a Bill of Lading and Why Does It Matter?\";}"],"_rank_math_schema_Article":["a:2:{s:5:\"@type\";s:7:\"Article\";s:8:\"headline\";s:48:\"What Is a Bill of Lading and Why Does It Matter?\";}"],"_uag_page_assets":["a:9:{s:3:\"css\";s:263:\".uag-blocks-common-selector{z-index:var(--z-index-desktop) !important}@media (max-width: 976px){.uag-blocks-common-selector{z-index:var(--z-index-tablet) !important}}@media (max-width: 767px){.uag-blocks-common-selector{z-index:var(--z-index-mobile) !important}}\n\";s:2:\"js\";s:0:\"\";s:18:\"current_block_list\";a:15:{i:0;s:11:\"core\/search\";i:1;s:10:\"core\/group\";i:2;s:12:\"core\/heading\";i:3;s:17:\"core\/latest-posts\";i:4;s:20:\"core\/latest-comments\";i:5;s:13:\"core\/archives\";i:6;s:15:\"core\/categories\";i:8;s:25:\"greenshift-blocks\/heading\";i:9;s:22:\"greenshift-blocks\/text\";i:10;s:14:\"core\/paragraph\";i:12;s:18:\"core\/legacy-widget\";i:13;s:17:\"core\/social-links\";i:15;s:16:\"core\/social-link\";i:16;s:21:\"trp\/language-switcher\";i:17;s:9:\"core\/html\";}s:8:\"uag_flag\";b:0;s:11:\"uag_version\";s:10:\"1787298764\";s:6:\"gfonts\";a:0:{}s:10:\"gfonts_url\";s:0:\"\";s:12:\"gfonts_files\";a:0:{}s:14:\"uag_faq_layout\";b:0;}"],"_uag_css_file_name":["uag-css-2447.css"]},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sourcing-basics"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"trp-custom-language-flag":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"admin","author_link":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/author\/admin\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"A bill of lading can look like another shipping PDF. It is not. It connects the physical shipment to the […]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2447"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2636,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2447\/revisions\/2636"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sourcingall.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2447"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}